The goals of this intervention are to:
Hospitals and clinics may survey patients regarding patient perceptions of individual providers (e.g., communication, effectiveness). [1] However, this feedback is often not communicated back to providers, particularly residents. Receipt of positive patient feedback may help residents to feel appreciated at work and/or to derive meaning from their patient interactions. Sharing positive patient feedback may also enhance the performance of medical teams. [2]
Meaning in Work |
Meaningful patient interactions require time and effort, but are largely disincentivized/unrewarded. They therefore compete with more visible task work. By recognizing residents’ efforts to build these relationships, programs may tip the balance of priorities towards more meaningful work. |
Organizational Culture and Values |
Sharing positive patient feedback with residents demonstrates a supportive culture that values residents’ time and efforts. Making this feedback simultaneously visible to leadership provides extra opportunities for recognition by those whose opinions residents hold in high esteem. |
1.There may be an office, such as Patient Relations or the Office of Patient Experience, that collects these data.
2.If not, suggest that they do so and/or initiate a process within your department. The Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) is a common mechanism for patients to provide feedback specific to their providers and healthcare experience. [3]
3.Other techniques include directed telephone surveys, in office surveys, or electronic instruments delivered via email.
1. If there is an office that collects these data:
2. If there is not, your point person will have to collect this feedback and screen it. At the University of Michigan, one of the APDs physically collects copies of this feedback from all of the participating clinics, and screens evaluations for those that are pertinent to residents.
1.This can be simple. At the University of Michigan, one of the APDs sends this feedback in an email to the associated resident, and cc’s the other program directors and department chair.
2.Other options exist for more publicly sharing this information, e.g., residency-wide email, verbal announcement at conference, printed and posted notice in a shared work space.
3.Consider creating an annual award for repeated positive feedback.
Coaches/Successful Implementations
University of Michigan
Coach: Gurjit Sandhu, PhD, Vice Chair of Resident Professional Development